Dec 29, 2015 at 8:49 AM
Join Date: Feb 2, 2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 620
Age: 29
Pronouns: she/her
Have you tried transcribing by ear before? It's harder, but you're most likely to do a more faithful transcription staying closer to the original material.For the former, it's hard to find good sheet music for "Reprise". I'll probably try this again at some point.
The limitations of ORG Maker don't necessarily mean you have to miss out on notes deliberately (which you seem to implying with this quote). Generally features like note bending do require a user to be more creative in finding ways to replicate the sound because of ORG's limitations, but "Can You Really Call This a Hotel..." doesn't have them. I do think you would be able to put in the notes you missed out, but I'll address it further below.For the latter, recall that I'm forcing a complex song into ORG. Some note variations are going to have to be accepted due to the limitations of ORGmaker.
Well, yes and no. For starters, I could have worded my statement better because I wasn't being specific - it's not all the notes that need a faster decay, but there are some that should. Secondly, comparing my ORGs to yours isn't exactly the best grounds for justifying a note decay personal preference. I (for the most part) post original compositions, while you mostly post transcriptions. Usually with transcriptions, people try to replicate a certain piece to sound as close to the original piece as they can get. And if the notes are quickly fading out in the original work, then I guess the only personal opinion that comes into play is how close you want to do the original justification or if you want to make it your own (which is fine too).Also, I feel like decay is something that's up to personal opinion. I know in your ORGs you tend to use a lot of fast decays and not so many slower ones, and I do the opposite, and that's just the way it works.
But yeah, if you aren't letting "personal opinion" get in the way, try listening to the original "Can You Really Call This a Hotel..." at half the speed - you will notice that those starting notes/chords aren't joined together - they basically fade out pretty quickly the moment they are played, but are not completely detached. Really, the closest way to replicate this sound in ORG is to make a faster volume decay curve. But by setting the second volume value you have for these opening notes (tracks 4 and 5) at almost the same height as its first volume value, you're not going to get much of that "quick fadeout" sound you would hear in the original piece.
Maybe, if you're still using v1. Otherwise, doubling the resolution is your friend, man. Also, with longer notes, you would be able to make a more proper fast decay curve for tracks 4 and 5.EDIT: Also for the latter, I'd already started the song and realized that there were 32nd notes in the piece until I'd already started it, and at that point its a little late to change the size of the measures.
Last edited: