Jun 29, 2015 at 12:31 AM
Offensive User
"Big Joe Tire and Battery Restaurant! Opening Soon! Eat at Big Joes!"
Join Date: Sep 7, 2011
Location: IT'S TIME FOR A SHAQDOWN
Posts: 539
pretty sure that's why he decided against line as well
Yeah, and then I double and triple-checked. No clue why it's messing up :/Noxid said:did you follow the instructions as I detailed them in that one post
(22:49:24) account: Connecting to account Dualhack@noxid.ca/.(22:49:24) connection: Connecting. gc = 060E0870(22:49:24) dnssrv: querying SRV record for noxid.ca: _xmpp-client._tcp.noxid.ca(22:49:24) dnssrv: found 1 SRV entries(22:49:24) dnsquery: Performing DNS lookup for noxid.no-ip.org(22:49:24) dnsquery: IP resolved for noxid.no-ip.org(22:49:24) proxy: Attempting connection to 99.251.201.13(22:49:24) proxy: Connecting to noxid.no-ip.org:5222 with no proxy(22:49:24) proxy: Connection in progress(22:49:24) proxy: Connecting to noxid.no-ip.org:5222.(22:49:24) proxy: Connected to noxid.no-ip.org:5222.(22:49:24) jabber: Sending (Dualhack@noxid.ca): <?xml version='1.0' ?>(22:49:24) jabber: Sending (Dualhack@noxid.ca): <stream:stream to='noxid.ca' xmlns='jabber:client' xmlns:stream='http://etherx.jabber.org/streams' version='1.0'>(22:49:24) jabber: Recv (418): <?xml version='1.0'?><stream:stream xmlns:stream='http://etherx.jabber.org/streams' version='1.0' from='noxid.ca' id='8c29ed70-292f-422d-ad86-c810f1e19046' xml:lang='en' xmlns='jabber:client'><stream:features><register xmlns='http://jabber.org/features/iq-register'/><mechanisms xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-sasl'><mechanism>SCRAM-SHA-1</mechanism><mechanism>DIGEST-MD5</mechanism></mechanisms></stream:features>(22:49:24) sasl: Mechs found: SCRAM-SHA-1 DIGEST-MD5(22:49:24) jabber: Sending (Dualhack@noxid.ca): <auth xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-sasl' mechanism='DIGEST-MD5' xmlns:ga='http://www.google.com/talk/protocol/auth' ga:client-uses-full-bind-result='true'/>(22:49:24) jabber: Recv (204): <challenge xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-sasl'>cmVhbG09Im5veGlkLmNhIixub25jZT0iMzI5ZDQ4ZDYtOTUzNS00ZmUxLTgwMzItOTM5MmNhMDYyOTEzIixxb3A9ImF1dGgiLGNoYXJzZXQ9dXRmLTgsYWxnb3JpdGhtPW1kNS1zZXNz</challenge>(22:49:24) sasl: DIGEST-MD5 client step 2(22:49:24) sasl: DIGEST-MD5 parse_server_challenge()(22:49:24) sasl: DIGEST-MD5 ask_user_info()(22:49:24) sasl: DIGEST-MD5 make_client_response()(22:49:24) jabber: Sending (Dualhack@noxid.ca): <response xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-sasl'>dXNlcm5hbWU9ImR1YWxoYWNrIixyZWFsbT0ibm94aWQuY2EiLG5vbmNlPSIzMjlkNDhkNi05NTM1LTRmZTEtODAzMi05MzkyY2EwNjI5MTMiLGNub25jZT0ieFNFZkxZZjJ0dlNJdm9xcHRtK1daYUE3b3dmaThBTnQvTTJxYVVQWS9kUT0iLG5jPTAwMDAwMDAxLHFvcD1hdXRoLG1heGJ1Zj00MDk2LGRpZ2VzdC11cmk9InhtcHAvbm94aWQubm8taXAub3JnIixyZXNwb25zZT01YmZkNjRiYTY0NTNiYzgwYWFmZDY2ZmE2ZGRjNmQ0OCxjaGFyc2V0PXV0Zi04</response>(22:49:25) jabber: Recv (77): <failure xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-sasl'><not-authorized/></failure>(22:49:25) sasl: DIGEST-MD5 client mech dispose(22:49:25) sasl: DIGEST-MD5 common mech dispose(22:49:25) sasl: Mechs found: SCRAM-SHA-1(22:49:25) sasl: No worthy mechs found(22:49:25) connection: Connection error on 060E0870 (reason: 2 description: Not Authorized)(22:49:25) account: Disconnecting account Dualhack@noxid.ca/ (029BF2B0)(22:49:25) connection: Disconnecting connection 060E0870(22:49:25) jabber: Sending (Dualhack@noxid.ca): </stream:stream>(22:49:25) connection: Destroying connection 060E0870(22:49:30) util: Writing file accounts.xml to directory C:\Users\MATHEW\AppData\Roaming\.purple(22:49:30) util: Writing file C:\Users\MATHEW\AppData\Roaming\.purple\accounts.xml(22:49:48) network: found network 'fios-router.home'(22:49:48) network: Received Network Change Notification. Current network count is 1, previous count was 1.
That sounds pretty paranoid... You don't have much to worry about if you nothing to hidejho said:It’s not a big stretch to suspect that we all are being watched, through our phones, cell, web cams, e-mail, txts, posts in forums, blogs and the like. My own analysis many different networks, wired and otherwise has shown a marked increase in outbound packets, way above what is required for the proper operation of a computer within Windows and the Mac OS. Currently the various Linux flavors show more normal packet volumes over multiple network types…
But what of Tox? From what I've skimmed through, there hasn't been any serious consideration regarding Tox yet. It has also went through a lot over the past year, and from personal experience is a very viable option to choose.Imo skype sucks but its still the best out there, considering we couldn't find a suitable replacement
Sadly, no matter how much better anything is than Skype it will always have one downfall: very few people use it. So you can call very few people. It would require a mass migration of people from Skype to certain other video chatting program.there's plenty of suitable replacements. You just have to pick one that suits you
I'd use telegram if it didn't need my damn phone number, so pidgin is what I have now.