Wedge of Cheese said:
Of course, if she's still doing it today, then there would be good reason for a temp-ban, but I honestly don't know what you mean about "her general behavior and statements against other users". Examples, mehbeh?
Convo 1 (I had to un-delete posts WD had deleted just to show this)
Convo 2
She also spammed up the SPOT a while back, IIRC in response to me locking a thread or something (which IIRC yourself then responded to quite a bit). She's as fair and balanced as Fox News.
Wedge of Cheese said:
All I see for most of that page is "deny deny deny SP u only mad coz u dun get it". As for the top post, his explanations consist
entirely of "you're deliberately taking everything the wrong way because you're a fucking douchebag and that's just the way it is and I'm doing everybody else a favour because my way of seeing things is the only right way". He literally states like two or three times that he said things because SP explicitly deserved them - not even because he
thought SP deserved them, but because he
did and it was
fair and nobody has any right to disagree. The only excuse that holds any weight at all is the final one. If this is what you consider a reasonable explanation then I don't know what to tell you? He was told to stop making attacking comments and he refused. Whether or not he thinks they were
deserved is irrelevant.
Wedge of Cheese said:
Fire's comments were slightly harsh, but really nothing by the standards of these forums. I've heard worse comments than Fire's on the forums that SP didn't even blink at, so SP is clearly not administrating in an unbiased manner as he should.
You mean the standards that people like him have helped to propagate? rolf. Firstly SP specifically said
this:
Salmon Pie said:
Other posts are older than a month or deleted.
Secondly, just because somebody says things and they aren't directly responded to doesn't mean they've been ignored. I had been taking note of the comments Fire had been making for months, and he knew he was on moderation watch from both me and SP. The way I see it each such case just provides more evidence when the time comes. He was given a chance to lighten up of his own volition, but instead he just grew steadily more hostile, to the point that he was berating users for exercising
their own fucking free right to contact other users privately. He's a creep with a raging unaccountability complex, and the only reason he wasn't banned permanently in the first place was because SP got to him before I did.
And yeah if there is to be a new admin it will be decided by the site staff, and will probably end up being one of them. A new
moderator (or two) may be made to fill the slot, but launching someone straight to admin is a terrible idea (I have to say, rofl at anyone who thought they seriously had a shot at this from a basic user account). That leaves me or andwhyisit. Andy has already given up admin privileges once because he "couldn't handle it" and isn't overly active anymore, and I don't particularly want it because I'm very busy at the moment and I can't police an entire forum on my own, nor do I feel like having to fluff every decision I make out with chocolate and fairly floss to make sure that everyone doesn't get
upset. So again I'm restating that it's not a good idea for this to happen.