The CSTSF 2015 Modding Competition

Let's not.

 

Hey now, let's not go asking valid questions expecting simple answers! It'll only lead to ruin.

 

Umm... What?
I just wanted to know = .=

Don't confuse yourself.
You already know the answer.

 

The answer is IN YOUR HEART!

 

So the answer is 'Yes'? T .T
I don't know! You know why I asked? Because I DON'T know!

It's up to your interpretation of the rules.

By "Justinifying"* answers, you can get away with ANYTHING!


*Patent Pending (Not really)--- By Jove, it's my name! I feel so important!

 

A lot of things aren't mentioned in the rules. See my previous comments in the topic for other valid questions nobody will actually answer.

It's trendy to be as obscure as possible.

 

I haven't read most of this thread but I think you're going about this the wrong way

I think the success of the modcon was partly due to its spontaneity and short timeframe. I believe that future challenges should follow a similar note, and be organized a bit like those game challenges or whatever, where you have a short amount of time and they have a "theme" that you need to follow, so you can't just come up with your whole idea months ahead of time.

 

what I've been saying all along. modcon was more like an extended game jam, which is great for the current community. give us big timeframes and we're gonna procrastinate.

also nobody cares about your trophies

 

Hoards of trophies just seem to dull the satisfaction of victory yeah

 

but

I can't do things on a month's notice anymore.

 

Too bad for you, then?

 

Also I wanted to wait untll my warning points were given.expired before I brought this up but...

User was warned for this post. - Andwhy

I have to argue that I being the Topic creator just backing somebody else said to be good enough of a response since my post would actually cont toward my opinion and therefor not qualify as spam. (and as a bonus, without having to say a singe word myself).

 

Call me a back seat mod, but I don't think this is the correct location to dispute warning points.

 

It was suppose to merge into my old post but then Dunc happened.

 

Ah... Still not the correct place (really), but at least it makes up for the fact that it gave you a post count. (What am I even saying?)

 

(and as a bonus, without having to say a singe word myself).

This right here is actually the main problem itself, and why "Quoting for truth" posts are against the rules. If you agree with someone's post, that's fine. But at the very least type up a sentence or 2 about why you agree with it or something, since otherwise your post has absolutely no new content.