cultr1 said:Almost balanced between male and female (55% male?)
Mostly bisexual
Indie music, alternative maybe?
CATS
no fursuiting
Yeah, and it sucks that none of us are psychologists or statisticians. I believe our purpose here is "for shits."Yakkers said:It'd be interesting, I've always wished some professional psychologists would be assed to do some kind of real, major study on furries someday.
I'll have my degree shortlyCaptain Fabulous said:or statisticians.
WoodenRat said:Furfags should get their arms chopped off.
Noxid said:surveys
Noxid said:interesting
I actually thought the surveys quite interesting.Noxid said:So nobody found those surveys I linked interesting at all?
I personally thought incidence of fursuiting would be way less than the reported 21.1%
Madotsuki said:I actually thought the surveys quite interesting.
It's plagued by that single-language thing though. Of course most people said they live in North America. It was an English-only survey, and (if I understand this correctly) focused on English fursuiting, while anywhere that speaks another language would be much more comfortable using that language. Which rules out most of Europe. So we get a rough demographic of English-speakers. Plus, cultural differences exist. I doubt that a Japanese furry is going to identify as one, as anthro art is more mainstream. I'm actually certain I'm wrong somewhere in this criticism, but whatever. It would have been interesting to see the continent demographics compared to one purely of english speakers in the world, to see rough english-speaker to english-speaking-furry ratios. Then we could see which continents tend to breed more furries per capita or something. I was not surprised at the demographics of age, as compared to Rust's survey. Is plushophile the same as fursuiting?
See? See the rant? This is why I don't talk about things.