Oy, i think you should take a look at this whole Fire banned thing.
SP already banned him for two weeks, then SP got pissed on IRC so he perma-banned fire before his two weeks were up. he was physically incapable of doing anything to get himself banned because he couldn't post at all.
SP put it to a vote on IRC, and two people (the only ones online) said yes, so he did it.
This, for some reason, seems unfair to me.
Sure, Fire was cutting it close, maybe the two week ban was rightfully deserved.
But what example is this setting for the administrators?
All I ask is that you think about how this went down, does this really seem like the right thing to do?