The Mother of All Cave Story Questions

Ditto

9. Reviving old threads should only be allowed if you have something to contribute to the thread's original topic.

Again, better to revive old threads than just create clone ones.
New members get entitled to create/add/support/etc. theories just as you did when you joined.

 

Maybe you shouldn't repeat yourself across threads, Lowell. Or you could just stop posting, but that's less likely. Now you're bumping this dead thread even more, and you're making ME bump it, too. THIS IS WHY WE CAN'T HAVE NICE THINGS.

 

Again, better to revive old threads than just create clone ones.
New members get entitled to create/add/support/etc. theories just as you did when you joined.

First, read the rule once more. Second, tell me what exactly did Icarus contribute to the thread. Third, bang your head against your desk and say aloud "I am an idiot" five times.

 

Meh.

First, read the rule once more. Second, tell me what exactly did Icarus contribute to the thread. Third, bang your head against your desk and say aloud "I am an idiot" five times.

Before I do any of that, who said I was talking about Icarus.
Theory threads don't get to die just because you guys get bored of them, unless you want new members creating 10 threads over the same thing. Which you don't.
I'm just telling Captain that the thread's not going to die.

Maybe you shouldn't repeat yourself across threads, Lowell. Or you could just stop posting, but that's less likely. Now you're bumping this dead thread even more, and you're making ME bump it, too. THIS IS WHY WE CAN'T HAVE NICE THINGS.

Like you did with your "Let this thread die aflmwosida" posts?

 

Before I do any of that, who said I was talking about Icarus.
Theory threads don't get to die just because you guys get bored of them, unless you want new members creating 10 threads over the same thing. Which you don't.
I'm just telling Captain that the thread's not going to die.

Okay, so what you're saying is "Better post one and the same thing a hundred times in the thread than let it die becase I said so." WHAT'S THE POINT?

 

Clutter

Okay, so what you're saying is "Better post one and the same thing a hundred times in the thread than let it die becase I said so." WHAT'S THE POINT?

To keep things organized, why else.
And if this thread dies/gets locked/is deleted, another will just come to take its place, so why fight the tide?

EDIT:
Swap to PMs?

 

To keep things organized, why else.
And if this thread dies/gets locked/is deleted, another will just come to take its place, so why fight the tide?

EDIT:
Swap to PMs?

Uh... since when is a dead thread unreadable? No, wait, nevermind. I forgot that arguing with you is pointless...

 

Sorry, I forgot to check the dates. It was on the first page and in most forums that means it's still living.

No more posting. Let it die.