What the. In just one day I miss so much info >< Sorry but I'm just gonna skim through the posts so... I might miss some info so don't flame me because of me not being un-lazy enough to read the posts above rofl.
Firstly,
@MetaSeraphim:
MetaSeraphim said:
No I don't because I can see my pink text perfectly on CaveStory lite. And you don't have to use the CaveStory skins, we have a total of 7 skins you can choose between. In fact I change which skin I am using once a week since looking at the same one over and over again gets boring.
True, people can change their forum skin but if they want to stick with their forum skin of choice then too bad. People like the forum skin they choose to keep so you can't make them change it just so that they can see YOUR coloured text better. Isn't it easier to just change your freaking habit of using coloured text? Or maybe just don't ask people to change it at all?
@XCalibar and the colour text issue: I don't think it's a good idea to use fixed colours for specific functions beacuse that WOULD make the forums too strict on colour issues. I don't think colours are a problem here >_> People can just easily highlight DOOM TEXT to see them, or text that are not easily seen against post backgrounds.
Edit on my comments to XCalibar: I don't even understand why you are making such rules. I mean, why >>>> for a new para? I don't understand a bit of it.
Why can't people have their own way of formatting their own posts? I mean why should we have rules to govern over anyone's way of expressing themselves? It's not like not using >>>> is gonna irritate to anyone >_>...
However, I'm not saying that using HUGE GIANT CRAZY BIG TEXT to express themselves is approved cause it DOES indeed irritate and annoy people =/...
(This statement was made just to prevent you guys from thinking that I'm contradicting myself ><)
Roonil Wazlib said:
Using irritatingly large and bold text to awfully insult someone in a not-playful manner. Especially so when it is in the form of spam ><
Roonil Wazlib said:
@ Bold: No, that is playful flame-spamming and not flaming. Flaming is an unprovoked use of abuses/insults in a discussion which would have developed into something constructive.
Omg can you take my whole sentence as the meaning instead of prying apart my sentence into stuff that don't make sense?? DDD:
Using irritatingly huge text to emphasize insults! The huge text and insults go together to form a cool chemical called FLAMEEEE!!! DDDDDDDDDDDD: