Wedge of Cheese

liberty-basic perkins-high

but my dad is not a perkins-high!
the number remains at three though - I forgot my cat
http://twitter.com/#!/PHunnPHarm

it was more of a comment on the state of humanity.
and it could only possibly be me, my brother, or my sister.
we have done some research and believe to be the only perkins-high's on the planet.

I don't even talk to people irl anymore. Just
post...





postagasming?

I love you

That just made my day.

it is fantastic.
a puzzle of love.

integration by parts is basically my favorite

for our conversation to exceed the number of posts on your wall total, you need to talk more than I do.

http://esper.net/publicirc.php
my icechat don't work either

ADSFADFHSDTXHFHXDF can't get irc to work

I don't quite recall when you went missing, so I am unable to fill you in.
Also, it'll be better if you read it yourself, I'm sure.

also, for the record:
http://www.cavestory.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=3167&view=findpost&p=114918

you're alive!
rejoice!

come chill on irc, I find it is much more conducive to rapidfire conversation

and I know, right?
ridiculous!

viva la wedge of cheese!

Ah, hope I didn`t went too far bugging you with the questions and PMs and stuff...Just had some downtime...sorry.

I like your sig.

I agree with everything here. I also referred to this. By grouping "subconscious" together with the physical and "conscious" with the "spirit", and adding the fact how the subconscious mind is amenable to suggestion from the conscious mind everything seems to open up. Both of these things "exist" and at least "existance" binds them together. In other worlds there is only one world not the separate worlds of these. My question is were these polarities always inherent qualities of "existance", or "existance" separated itself in two? I know when I think positively positive results emerge. Maybe if we say that the conscious thought influenced my subconscious (modern medicine says so too) and a result emerged (in a sense a third entity). I`ve heard somewhere that "from one comes two and from two comes the whole world" (might be unprecise quoting). If the result (third) of this process benefits everybody it was worth applying the principles. That is also what justifies it. I think by making the world a better place by choosing noble things to dwell on is the practical side of this. For long I had trouble even with such basics why "nature" and "subconscious" were - as in the diagram - grouped together. A little enlightenment in the theory is what I need I suppose. Btw. I used veiled language in the post "Aim of life" and also in the review towards your music, but I think you figured. This is also maybe because I don`t have a good theoretical foundation of the basics despite the fact I apply these principles for good and for good and nothing else. In short that confused me. I know how ignorant and therefore in a sence evil (ignorance and evil are akin to some authors) before I was learning some basics. Now a level is reached again, but since love itself is infinite I know I there must be an even better understanding.

darn.
well I think basically they all have the same bassline but have completely distinct melodies.
I was wondering whether they could be tied together better to form a contiguous piece or summit.

what do you know about the goldberg variations?