Signatures

BhadRebelle had a REALLY LARGE signature a week or so before this thread was made. Like nearly 1000x1000 or so IIRC.

Oh...fail on my part sorry I barely joined on tuesday so I would'nt know..

 

I am thinking of bringing my old changing images sig back, if I had enough time to spend on the forum to put forth that effort. . .


At least now that it has been almost a year all those silly goons who decided to start copying image changing sigs should have moved on by now.

 

I am thinking of bringing my old changing images sig back, if I had enough time to spend on the forum to put forth that effort. . .


At least now that it has been almost a year all those silly goons who decided to start copying image changing sigs should have moved on by now.

I still have one. On this forum, yes.

 

I see that now, not bad.

 

At the risk of coming off as a grumpy old guy, I find 200 pixels to be a little large actually, given that it's a sixth of my screen, and most people don't have 1200 vertical resolution. Just seeing Noxid's nurr hurr image, it's way too tall for me. Maybe like 150-180 or something?

 

1024 wide could be nice

 

I think 800 should definitely be the absolute maximum for forum signatures. Otherwise you will risk stretching the page on some computers.

 

True, now that I look at it on my non-fat-ass laptop. I think 800 is good too.

 

Do signatures stretch the page? Because that image doesn't for me, and my screen is 1024 pixels wide.

 

If the picture's large enough IPBoard shrinks them down to fit the boundaries/whatever

 

It stretches the page when I'm on 800x600, but not when i'm on 1024x768 (it shrinks the image if at this resolution).
Either way I still say 800 is a good limit for width. I don't see why you'd need more than that.

 

It stretches the page when I'm on 800x600, but not when i'm on 1024x768 (it shrinks the image if at this resolution).
Either way I still say 800 is a good limit for width. I don't see why you'd need more than that.

If it shrinks the image at 1024x768 and above, why does it stretch the image when the resolution is 1920x1080?

 

It stretches the page when I'm on 800x600, but not when i'm on 1024x768 (it shrinks the image if at this resolution).
Either way I still say 800 is a good limit for width. I don't see why you'd need more than that.

He never said it shrinks above this resolution.

 

How do you get that internets thing to work?

 

You don't.

 

No one liners. Cmon dunc, you should know this as a veteran member. And just because im not, doesent give you the right to be an ass. Anyways I signed up for it, and now I can't figure it out.

 

Here he's conveying a point however. He's not saying "I agree" or "hhahahaa thats funny", but he's stating his opinion that internets sux ass. Which they do.

Anyway, go to the "account" page and find the BBcode mess - like this [ url=http://internetometer.com/give/36365][ img]http://internetomete...image/36365.png[/img ][/url ]

Then copypasta into your signature.

(This would become )

Also it auto-updates.

 

Ah fuck, I can't believe you've done this.

 

A long time ago. I only made that account as an example.

 

I think he means "Why would you tell them you've opened pandora's box yet again"