Did anybody else notice this about Resource Hacker?

Sep 5, 2010 at 5:00 AM
Senior Member
"Master using it, and you can have this!"
Join Date: Oct 20, 2009
Location: Kansas
Posts: 84
Age: 27
When I first read the post saying to get it, it said to make a backup of the EXE before saving your changes.
But, regardless wheter there is a backup or not, if I do File>Save, it renames the EXE, EXE_original, and makes a new EXE with all the changes.
Was that post made before ResHacker was updated to include this, or did the poster just neglect to say that it did that?
 
Sep 5, 2010 at 5:15 AM
In my body, in my head
Forum Moderator
"Life begins and ends with Nu."
Join Date: Aug 28, 2009
Location: The Purple Zone
Posts: 5998
I think that line is more of a Catch-all clause saying "I told ya so, don't blame me" incase something funky happens.
 
Sep 5, 2010 at 5:19 AM
Senior Member
"Master using it, and you can have this!"
Join Date: Oct 20, 2009
Location: Kansas
Posts: 84
Age: 27
(S)He could have at least pointed it out. :/
 
Sep 5, 2010 at 5:38 PM
Not anymore
"Run, rabbit run. Dig that hole, forget the sun."
Join Date: Jan 28, 2010
Location: Internet
Posts: 1369
Age: 34
adark said:
When I first read the post saying to get it, it said to make a backup of the EXE before saving your changes.

The reason people say this is because it's much easier to ruin a mod than to make one. If you only have 1 copy and you mess it up, you'd have to start all over. However, if you have backups, then you only lose a little work. So, people will tell you to do this regardless of what kind of modding tool you're using, even if that tool has features for "backup" already.
 
Top