Search results

When and why did Shining change his name to Adolf K.

Enlightened, while you're correct that it's generally bad practice to have an "always-on" event, me and noxid actually hacked in a workaround so that doing so doesn't disrupt your ability to take damage etcetera. This is in use in the Pyramid mod; dunno if its documented in any other thread...

WELL. Foreskin is pretty great. I have a lot more nerve endings than a snipped dude. But if there's like a big puddle of foreskin, then that's probably going too far. So the magic amount is: Enough to cover the peen when flaccid, but to be a little bit revealing when erect?

I've been looking at programming language design recently, and what I've noticed is that there are basically two classes of successful language: those which are made/commissioned by industry giants, and those which are made by scholars, people who are mostly interested in pushing the envelope...

Woopsie. There were supposed to be three pieces of code, but while formatting that post I accidentally deleted one and put another at the wrong offset. The correct code is: 0x415474: jmp 415495 0x415584: mov eax,dword ptr ds:[49E650] and eax,00000010 je short 004155A3 mov ecx,dword ptr...

So. I was in the neighborhood and nobody seems to have provided an answer to poor mister idiotbaka, so let's see if I can help. (and I'm going to give you a step-by-step so maybe one of you guys might eventually learn reverse-engineering rather than just how to write new code) *** I haven't...

alternatively keep the arguments positive and neg eax afterwards. think that's probably more efficient.

(maybe I'm being a jerky snarkosaurus, but honestly...)

He is. Bigger first!

STEP ONE: Open OllyDbg STEP TWO: Go to the address you already posted (0x410409) STEP THREE: Woah crazy it's part of a push to a function. Man, I wonder if I could have figured that out by simple inspection*? STEP FOUR: Fiddle with that function to see if it's what you want. If it is, you can...

*cough* (this was the most prominent movie thread that I could remember, but I also found about 7 more just by using the "search" feature at the top right corner of the page :rolleyes:. It's awesome to be enthusiastic, but maaaybe you should check these things first?)

The letter does make a point. You're gonna want to be less careless

iirc the blinky thing is hardwired into the code - it isn't drawn from the font at all. thankfully, drawing routines are pretty easy to switch around, and so anyone with a dollop of reverse engineering capabilities could do this hack pretty easily.

relevant: http://xkcd.com/60/

Not really, no. You'd have to rewrite the graphics functions completely, and that's a bit of an ambitious project.

^ That, or open up the exe with a hex editor and change the 24 at 0xfe80 to the id of whatever song you want to play

CE and BL don't magically know what TSC commands there are in the executable -- the commands list is based off of a text file that was created beforehand. i.e. even if you properly installed <IBF, it would appear as red in the ediors. Try using the <IBF command despite what the editors are...

aaaaaaaand here we are. sorry about that taking a while. I'm not entirely sure what your exact issue was because I got bored bugchecking and made my own version instead(omitted: code to check RNJ-ness) mov eax,[4a5ae0] add eax,4 push eax call 421900 ; number of choices into eax add esp,4...

I'm about to go read through that, but off the bat I'm noticing that you have arg_handler in the defines and arg_handeler everywhere else. Which may be a source of some difficulties. I'll edit when I'm finished e: stuff is in a new post