Search results

But...why?

Actually Scamper Ghost might be kind of appropriate considering the fact that Pac Avoid was recently taken down, and it kind of relates to the "Candy" fiasco and whatnot. I dunno in terms of replay value, there's only so much you can get out of an endless game where the only point is to get a...

I actually didn't mind watching the anime, but after season 14, when they basically got rid of the character I felt kept the show going (Brock), I just stopped watching it. In my opinion, seasons 10-13 were the best as well as another one which I can't remember. You're right that it is...

Even though the topic question doesn't specify, I'm pretty sure you mean the games. I've never played them, just watched the anime. And I don't even watch that anymore. D:

Yeah, I actually forgot about the watertank bit, but it seems she still managed to survive even without it after the Ironhead battle. (of course we don't really know how long she was in the water without the tank)

(I tried searching for a thread with this subject, but the closest I could find was this post that no one else seemed to answer to.) Anyways, I was curious. Say Quote drains the water from Curly in the Waterway Cabin. He notices that it takes time for her to fully regain consciousness. Naively...

Your inability to recognize dangers as being actually dangerous is almost admirable.

...I think I might be dying after watching all those hzRf56XbrNA

All these weight loss threads...could it be a sign?

Spambots, that's what they are. Apparently you're not supposed to reply to them. [/backseat moderating, sorry]

Hard levels should be balanced with fluid controls. If the controls aren't easy to handle, difficulty shouldn't be ramped up until much later in the game. Heh. That's just my useless opinion for the day. In this case, the controls are a bit slippery, which makes precise navigation a bit too...

That description sounds like Candy Land. XD Sorry a quick note: the controls description in the bottom left corner is really hard to read, but manageable. Spikes being candy canes made total sense to me; those things are dangerous. I always poke my tongue with them. Oh well. It looks neat so...

I saw it more as the overall idea, not the specifics. I just wanted to make sure we considered different sides, that's all. Personally I still think implementing this is redundant but if there's not enough common sense for people to know when to stop then I guess disallowing it is simply for...

*Most of the time. Also sorry, I wasn't actually offended, but I don't like the idea of calling it crap just because two people were involved in a discussion. As long as you know that posing such questions give rise to deeper arguments and you're prepared for it then it should be okay.

I understand your intentions for doing this are for the better, but I don't think flat out banning is the right approach. It's true, some people love to sit on others whose views contradict theirs and as a result, two opposite forces collide. But not every discussion I've seen about religion is...

I didn't realize answering other people's questions concerning religion automatically translates to "crap". Good to know.

Looking down at the clock, I just realised that I've been registered here for a year...yeah, that excitement lasted for mere seconds. Now it's back to test evasion - I mean anxiety.

It's okay; you tried.

Everyone is two people? Okay then. Meanwhile, where I live, there's not even enough snow to go skiing on the mountains this year. Think we can take some of that cold winter back here?

Is his head supposed to be that huge in comparison to the rest of his body?