Search results

Some images are missing for the CS Lite skin: http://www.cavestory.org/forums/cavestory/misc/whos_online.gif (at the bottom of the index page) http://www.cavestory.org/forums/cavestory/buttons/multiquote_off.gif http://www.cavestory.org/forums/cavestory/buttons/multiquote_on.gif (on any post)...

Couldn't you just move the helicopter? It's tiles, isn't it? Or is it a gigantic entity? If it's tiles, a sequence of tile change operations could make it move onscreen. If it's an entity, are there not commands to move entities?

Well, yay! We have new mods! :D This is rarely if ever true. Yours, or MetaSeraphim's. Or even both.

Whoa, just noticed this thread. I realize that it hasn't been posted to for quite awhile, but perhaps resurrecting it will attract the developer guy back... hopefully. This doesn't occur in the Mac version, though, so I'd make it optional (set a preference or something). Easier, but not...

You know, there's always the option of deciding on candidates in private, then asking them in private and, if they accept, only then announcing it in public. That's how I became a mod on another forum. The length of time someone has been on the forum shouldn't matter, though at the same time...

Re: Andwhy's mod porting thread What about the Enemy Rush mod? I'd be surprised if that contains any assembly hacks. You still haven't attempted porting ones with assembly hacks, right? Doing that properly would require not only copying the hacks but also translating them to PPC assembly (both...

I'm not working on an editor, but I might, some day. It's less different than you might think. Okay, so technically it's totally different, but there are similarities; for example, if you don't care about PPC support, the assembly is the same flavour of assembly. I'd guess that data within the...

Yes and no. The forum is owned by one person, and it's perfectly fine for that person to set whatever rules they wish. At the same time, the administrators do need to account for the opinions of the users. They shouldn't depend on the users to make decisions for them, but nor should they make...

Not so. A forum is not a democracy. If the owner wants to ban people for the slightest offence, there's nothing you can do about it. ...uh, speak for yourself. I wasn't particularly happy when he came back...

Re: #CurlyBrace: An IRC Solution! The trouble with the ignore feature is a) some clients don't have it, b) you miss useful contributions by the people you're ignoring, and c) you only see one side of conversations between someone on your ignore list and someone not on it. Uh... isn't XChat...

Sounds nice, apart from the part where you're an op. I don't think I'd be interested in joining such a channel... not just because you're the owner, but also because the existing #Doukutsu channel suits me just fine. Plenty of people. I'm almost always around; you can poke me if you want to talk...

The above picture is broken. :( I think pre-insane Ballos should have hair, and also I agree that the king's crown looks too much like the Demon Crown. It's a nice picture despite all that, though.

Uh, what if you click the wrong colour? :p But really, GIMP beats Paint here. You can use the eyedropper without even switching to it! More precisely, when you're using the paint tool, you can Ctrl-Click (I think it's Ctrl) to grab the colour you click on, then just continue painting. I'm pretty...

Ah, okay, that makes sense then. And sounds useful. It's a bit like a patching program really.

Ah, so it's basically a case of "we don't know the right way yet". The Mac executable format is incompatible with the Windows one; there's no reason to assume that the offsets would be the same. If by Tkinter you mean the Tcl GUI interface, then no, I have no experience with it. I have...

I would tend to disagree; it's better to do it right the first time then to have to fix it later.

As far as I know, there is only a Universal binary. I would also say to those people porting mods, that if they require assembly, you should consider either stripping out the PPC code or finding some way to convert the x86 code to PPC code. I really wish I had seen this thread earlier, because...

So, flags go from 49dda0 to 49e188, and variables start at 49e090. That's 248 bytes for the variables, which as you say is 124 variables. Well, it's true that the VXXX method is "read-only"; more precisely, VXXX is simply the way to read a variable. That says nothing about whether the variable...

Oh. Alright then. Woodenrat's is horrible, Fahrenheit's is quite nice. As usual. :rolleyes:

...no. No you don't. You never deserve a crash. Plus, putting in an out-of-bounds value doesn't imply "dumb"; it could be simply a typing error. Actually, Noxid, could I have an explanation of why this is? DragonBoots tried to explain, but he didn't really seem to understand either. A tad...

I can't really handle a conversation going more than, say, five posts a minute, at least when I'm doing other things. By throwing out fifteen or thirty posts per minute (I haven't counted, so I'm just picking numbers out of a hat), you essentially "flood" me, and I have to leave in order to get...

Ah, okay. I hate it when people do that, especially without a note that they did it. :rolleyes:

Yes. Learn x86 and PPC assembly, disassemble the Mac executable, and figure out how it works. Once you've done that, you can duplicate this hack for the Mac. That's not as easy as I made it sound, by the way. I wouldn't say 0%; if the hack doesn't rely on calling any system library functions...

This is definitely a better choice than out-of-bounds VXXX arguments. I can understand why you wouldn't want to do that though; it would require having some sort of lookup table mapping the system constants to their memory location. In general, though, I completely agree with Andwhyisit...

Well, if you can't be bothered to wait, you might as well not show up at all.