-
This is just a reminder that you're awesome.
Hey Nox. You're awesome.
The internet whispers strange things to me.
I try not to listen!
Because rather than loading page by page as needed, it loads the entire exe into memory at once, which can theoretically cause a slowdown.
Also it makes it so the exe can't refer to itself? (idk I read this somewhere).
But iunno!
upx has to be run from console. You navigate to the folder it's in, then type the command "upx programname.exe" [obv. substituting the name of the thing you want to compress] and hit enter to see it go. Why would compressing the exe ever be a bad thing? There's a bit about dll's, how if you compress those they can't be shared by diff programs, but that's irrelevant.
Furthermore I can't irc tonight because stuff.
irc?
I am not understanding how to do the UPX :Face
Also my internets are saying compressing exes is a bad idea?
I am not understanding how to do the UPX :Face
irc?
Alright, I've listened to the first 5 so far, and I think in terms of just overall quality, Main Vein is my favorite. No Ya Not & No Ya Didn't is somewhat funkier, but the former feels more like "soooouuulll music" to me.
Compulsion
yeah
!!
http://www.cavestory.org/forums/index.php?showuser=2126
This epidemic needs to be stopped.
It could add another layer of security to 2xres then, but as far as I know more security is unnecessary.
I'll try it out once I find an exe to use it on
Huh.
Is this what you used to compress JiLJiL?
Perhaps because CS is not a valid EXE?
Wikipedia just gave me a vague overview, but other than that no.
Pourquoi?
Hey uh my memory is failing me, can you remember what the third boss in Metal Paws was/if there was one?
Well I was just doing double as shortnotation -- it would actually have to be mov ecx,[buffa+eax*4] followed by [ecx].
That was what I was thinking too, but I wasn't sure (particularly on byte dword cost equivalence)
Hmk.
On a completely unrelated note, do you have thoughts on this?:
Assuming eax is either 0, 1, or 2, would you think that [[buffa+eax*4]] or [buffb+eax*4b000] would be a faster operation? (they are equivalent, ie, [buffa] = buffb, [buffa+4] = buffb+4b000, [buffa+8] = buffb+96000)
Hmk -
Loading…
-
Loading…
-
Loading…
-
Loading…
