Search results

Bane'd for being Batman

I would pay you for doing so

You can't automate affection, you monster. am i convincing yet

And I am saying you have no idea how jokes work because this one was funny exactly for the reason you just stated.

It obviously was a joke.

Long term participation is usually something that happens because people have things to say. I believe that encouraging the idea of "posting more" regardless of the content can only lead in a degradation of the average content quality, because: - Users might force themselves to make...

This is a feature that has never been accepted by the admins. We actually did ask (again) for this feature to be kept when the forums migrated to Xenforo (which had a liking system by default). @DoubleThink (notably) rejects the idea, for reasons that I can understand, though I disagree that...

Yeah I'd advise you to use Booster's Lab, because it's by far the most complete and stable of the three. @Noxid boy tell 'em

Thank you for your kind, constructive and encouraging input xzin. Jethawk: I do like the concept, actually. You made significant changes to the way physics work in the game, something that I wasn't expecting. The physics are awkward, the inertia (which goes well with the original CS) is...

this thread is 20 pages long, how do people still manage to miss the point of the game

I think muri by xzin is pretty okay, it certainly has much better game design than WTF Story

Here in my cave, just bought this uh, new scuttlebug here. Fun to raise up here in the falling rocks. But you know what I like a lot more than upwarps? Half A presses. In fact, I'm a lot more proud of these quadruple new parallel universes that I had to get aligned to hold five hundred thousand...

>violently menacing people giving you advice on the internet you may have some anger management problems zkin you should look into those

who the fuck are you

That would be an interesting philosophical debate, but objective facts can appear within a context. Also, what you said does not actually contradict my sentence.

As far as language designs themselves go, my favorite has to be OCaML. But since its standard library is a bit weak at the knees (and it doesn't have a very good dedicated IDE and debugger), I will often use F# instead. I used to like Scala the most, but the JVM is too much of a pain for me to...

You're missing the point again. The keyword here is not "common". It's "functional". The term you want is "functional paradigm", not "recursive paradigm" (which is not a thing).