Search results

what would that even look like?

This can be done I believe with setting one flag in CE, so not really a hack by my standards. Still well within the realm of engine compliance.

Oh well there was this one thread but don't post there. I still think Majora's Mask is the bomb diggity btw, but LttP is also extra special.

Sometimes that's all it takes.

Because they dont' believe in censorship Do you **** with ****** ****?

quite a peppy animation :0

9/10 It's mysterious and shoots mysterious projectiles -> :pignon: Also wow this thread has over 1100 posts, I didn't realize there were so many characters.

There are probably some other values you need to edit... I can look later.. but not right now.

http://www.cavestory.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=674 You may also need this

http://www.cavestory.org/forums/threads/218/ You will need a hex editor it is not difficult.

:droll:

not really.. I hardly have time for my own mod.

Stop snooping my messages :sun: no.

Well with that video it shouldn't be hard to reproduce the entire mod in the space of half an hour The booster is just using runelancer's imperfect 'Infinite Booster' hack. I think it requires hex editing approx. one number.

The issue was that Lunarsoul keeps calling his mod a hack Anyway I like Lace's definition too...

As far as I know that was just a (weird) sprite edit wasn't it?

1) I don't have Ballos Story 2) 2x Resolution is applied with faerie dust and other enchantments to prevent its use for plain Cave Story. 3) I am aware of how Pixel feels about mods. If I had known this when I began I would not have started. 4) thanks...?

I would love to see that. I don't think I'd be capable of such a feat. but even just another ref would be cool so I have multiple angles to work from

I might try again later it is shameful to be asked to produce a caricature and then make some bullshit random face.

Haha oh dear Also, if it were easy it wouldn't be fun :mahin:

Well there are other difficulties with a technical definition as well For example, what would define a "hack"? Would you need a certain amount of code, a certain degree of functionality changed? Does it count if you modify hard-coded values only? What about framerects edits? Personally I would...

Well you see, if you define it based on technical merit then the only people who can tell if something is a hack or not are the hackers. If it's based on visible functionality then there is a clear difference between a hack and a mod that anyone can see.

What he means is the TSC parser itself is a hack, but it doesn't make a mod into a hack because it doesn't cause notable change. Making it a hack doesn't necessitate restructuring of the logic; for example, if you manipulated the variables of a critter in such a way as for it to act...

Good point. Split...

Well see that is why we try to correct people when they use them wrong, to eliminate the confusion and have more clearly defined terminology.