Search results

okay, that's all my guesses that I had... how about Curly? Somehow? or Itoh? yeah, this does seem to be a little vague. But don't give us the answer just yet! x)

yeah, I did say recording *quality*, not volume. The output is high, and input is low. I'll try lowering the recording volume a little then.

Oh, right. I had no idea... The quality of it isn't unbearable, it's just comparably inferior to the real thing. Should stereo mix recording sound pretty much exactly like the real thing when done correctly?

aww, I was pretty sure about that one... That hint kinda helps. I've sort of got some more ideas now, but according to the rules of this thread I'm not allowed to guess twice... Ah well.

hmmm... is it... the zombie dragons from egg corridor? also, is the strange choice of capitalisation meant to mean anything? I couldn't pick anything up from it...

Ah, I think I have an integrated sound processor (I'm on a laptop). That might be a problem then?

http://www.presonus.com/products/Studio-One/explore/start-free-go-pro ^^^^ This is a pretty cool *free* music making tool. ^^^^^ Or at least, the free version is free (there are lots of other expensive versions with more stuff). It does have all the features I could ever expect...

ah, that helped. But it still doesn't quite sound quite the right quality, even when I turned the recording quality up (even though I have no idea if that should do anything...) Is there a chance it could be something to do with my sound card?

Okay, I've tried it again and now it works, but the quality still isn't right... Is it even possible that my stereo mix might not be doing it at a very high quality, like a sound card issue or something like that? When listening to the actual org then the audacity file consecutively, it's quite...

This is really helpful, thanks. I think the problem is that I was listening to the stereo mix whilst recording it, so that's why some of the quality was being messed up (at least, I know it's what messed up the panning (even though I didn't mention that, but meh)). *tries* And now I can't...

I've searched up about converting it to a .xm using org2xm (and then converting .xm to .wav), but that sometimes doesn't work so well for some reason... For tracks where org2xm gets it right, I can convert it fine, but that's not always the case. I'm also aware that I can record the sound...

Meanwhile, I'm sitting here in the UK without a single drop of snow... Glad you came out of the situation alright though, I had no idea this sort of stuff was happening. Actually, it's been abnormally warm this winter for us.

Personally, I found OrgMaker much less intimidating than most other music programs I've used. But I guess copying parts can be quite a bit of hassle... I didn't know the selection area at the bottom existed at first, so I had to go back and try to remember all of the numbers that I needed to...

hmmm... I think I kinda prefer no.2, but I'm not sure why. But I do think he should be less frowny and his hair should be in small spikes.

whoa, I actually really like these! I haven't been on the forums long enough to know what you used to be like, but you're certainly good now :P I really like the awkward time signatures ^_^ Although I have to say, by the time I'd listened to that crash cymbal sound 1000 times, it was starting...

I think no.3, but the eyes should be bigger or moved out & up slightly. That, or no.4 as it is. I actually quite like 4 :p EDIT: here's an image that I quickly edited in paint.net to show you what I was trying to say (kind of). I ended up erasing the hair and having to completely re-draw it, so...

Forum user name: MrLog Email: MrLog229@yahoo.co.uk Operating system: windows 7 64 bit Computer specs: Acer Aspire 5942 intel Dual-Core i7 1.73 GHz 4GB RAM ATI mobility radeon HD 5650 graphics 1GB resolution: 1336x768 -okay -cool

This actually looks like it'd be a really awesome model! Something looks not quite right about his fringe though, I think the left should be lowered a bit or something like that. Also, his hand seem very slightly too small in proportion with his arms.

yeah, I agree about the head being smaller. I think the big head looks good in pixel art, but not in actual 3D. I never really liked cave story 3D's character models... I reckon he looks best with this kind of build imho.

the physics based animations in this are amazing! I really like the look of this game. It looks really fun, challenging and addictive ^_^ I can't wait for any demos to be released (if you're planning to release any demos).

literally the only things I didn't like about it were the 'J' on the title screen, and Jen's mouth when it's closed (it needs to be a bit darker so you can see it). But other than that, this mod is awesome! Especially loving the maps. does 'some of your staff' include me? ^_^ I wouldn't mind...

that is pretty awesome, but there are a few too many brass instruments there for my liking (personal preference, I guess you could say ^_^ ). Also, the in the twiddly high part played by the flute, when it moves down a tone from G to F, the C also moves down a tone to a Bb (I think. It sounded...

monster X was by far the most difficult in hard mode on the wiiware version ._. (never doing that again!) Then I went and did it taking no damage in normal mode -_- Although, I guess it's kinda easy in the original. What makes Ballos difficult is the fact that I'm usually really low health by...

link between worlds ^_^ oh, and I got SMB: the lost levels for 3ds. It's pretty difficult.

I'd love to give this a go! My steam username's MrL0g. - Noxid - GIR - Pixel - pboy3 - Dunc2403 - tale_zero - QuoteSan - Yacker - Hate9 - Thatnamelessguy - MagicDoors - Aar - Nadojin - Rubyyoshi - Dage4 - ShinyElectricBlueTiger - MrLog